The Vicar’s Daughter by Betty Neels: I take my time with a Betty Neels story, and I like taking my time with a Betty Neels story. In no rush to reach the end, I savor all the details that I know for sure I will encounter in one of Neels’s story. This one was no different. In fact, it was a pleasant revelation of sorts! A few pages into the story, it hit me that I’d read this one years ago, and disdained its nothing-happens-in-it-ness. I also recall feeling disgusted at the sheer stupidity of its heroine. What a pleasant surprise to find that it was exactly its quietness that made me enjoy the story this time around. And what I’d labeled as Margo’s stupidity, now came across as an endearing quality. Isn’t it fun, and funny, how a few years, and some living of life changes the way we perceive a thing? Have you had any reading experience where you’ve swung from one side of the pendulum to another? (Or perhaps just drifted along the spectrum?)
Wintersmith by Terry Pratchett: Need I mention that I loved it? If there were such a thing as a spirit author, I think Terry Pratchett would be mine. I find myself highlighting/marking reams and reams in any Pratchett story I read. He’s thought-provoking, funny (even when things are NOT fun!), and generally some flavor of what I’ve experienced as “true” in my own life. I’ve already put another of his Discworld stories (Going Postal) on hold (I want there to be some passage of time between Wintersmith, and the next Tiffany Aching story that I read).
Tiffany grows up some more in Wintersmith. She (and we) experience the power of the stories we tell ourselves (and others), and come to inhabit, even more forcefully. There’s this whole “Boffo” plot in the story centered around this concept that I absolutely loved (and don’t want to talk about for fear of spoiling it!)
It made sense. Of course it made sense. It was all Boffo! Every stick is a wand, every puddle is a crystal ball. No thing had any power that you didn’t put there. Shambles and skulls and wands were like . . . shovels and knives and spectacles. They were like . . . levers. With a lever you could lift a big rock, but the lever didn’t do any work.
Annagramma, who we met in A Hat Full of Sky, returns in Wintersmith. She’s as unthinking, stupid, and annoying (Tiffany’s words!) as before but it’s interesting to note that in time of need she turns to Tiffany, and that Tiffany finds it in her to see to the truth of Annagramma—annoying but also perhaps a little frightened at her core, and deserving of Tiffany’s help. I’d call them frenemies, and I actually find their relationship oddly satisfying.
Annagramma does not suddenly transform into a kind soul herself as a result of all the kindness she receives. She continues to be annoying but her annoyingness does lose its edge. It becomes more rounded, and she herself becomes more bearable as we see this side of her where she’s willing to ask for help, and follow-through on what she receives. I really like how her character developed in Wintersmith, and I hope there’s more of her in the next two books!
Tiffany had looked up “strumpet” in the Unexpurgated Dictionary, and found it meant “a woman who is no better than she should be” and “a lady of easy virtue.” This, she decided after some working out, meant that Mrs. Gytha Ogg, known as Nanny, was a very respectable person. She found virtue easy, for one thing. And if she was no better than she should be, then was just as good as she ought to be.
Witch Week by Diana Wynne Jones: So here’s the thing. I find Diana Wynne Jones intellectually satisfying but I find Pratchett intellectually AND emotionally satisfying. Does that make sense? Has anyone else experienced this with respect to these two authors (or maybe another pair)? Maybe you’ve felt the exact reverse of what I stated?
This is my sixth Wynne Jones (I’ve read the first two in Howl’s Moving Castle, and the first four in Chrestomanci), and I am very definitely going to be reading A LOT more of her books but I find myself contemplating this difference in the way I connect with Jones, and Pratchett.
I think part of it maybe because of the fact that in most of the books I’ve read so far (by Jones), I have NO IDEA what is going on till more than the half-way mark while I have some dim sense of the meaning underlying the gobbledygook in Pratchett. Then there’s the setting of Pratchett’s story vs. Wynne Jones’s. Tiffany Aching’s world is one of plains, and forests, while most of the Wynne Jones’s stories that I’ve read so far happens in buildings—schools, castles, houses. In and of itself, I wouldn’t find this particularly claustrophobic. But when I juxtapose it with Pratchett’s stories, I can’t help feeling slightly confined by them. There’s this sense of openness, this sense of an all-encompassing-ness that I feel in the Tiffany Aching stories, and that I find myself responding to which I don’t feel in Wynne Jones’s books. It is of course possible that this does indeed exist in Wynne Jones’s world too and is just something I haven’t tuned in to yet! Even in terms of their systems of magic, Wynne Jones’s just is (and there’s nothing wrong with that!) but I do so love the way it seems to work in Pratchett’s, or Tiffany Aching’s world at any rate. It’s this heady mix of a zen-like practise, common sense, the use of herbs and plants, and a leveraging of folklore that appeals to me! (And I am not even referring to what “witching” is really supposed to be about!)
What about Witch Week itself? It is so clever! (Also, the next paragraph MIGHT be considered spoiler-ish so consider yourself warned)
At its heart, this is a book about the ways in which we cope with being different. The characters in the book try to hide their differences, feel scared at being different, and do their best to blend in. And yet, they can’t help feeling pulled towards what they perceive as being different within them. I thought the twist in the end regarding this was simply spectacular. Turns out EVERYONE is different! I’m a little in awe of the way the story and the theme are so inseparable in this one!
I liked this but I enjoyed Conrad’s Fate and The Lives of Christopher Chant more. I’m also really looking forward to The Magicians of Caprona, and The Pinhoe Egg, both of whose summaries make me think that I’ll probably enjoy them! Fingers-crossed!
I don’t think anyone quite does a christmas romance like Neels. She seems to gather all that is nostalgic and old fashioned and imbue it with this mood and tone that makes me wistful for times gone by…even though I was far to young to remember them (!) I really liked this one too!
I do feel a little the same about Prattchet & Wynne Jones (although I haven’t read that many of hers…) When I read Pratchett; his whole worlds seem much bigger, older, further reaching, with a deeper past and a wider scope…Of course he has had dozens and dozens of books to get to that point I suppose –
When I read Wynne Jones’ I am reminded of Susan Cooper’s The Dark is Rising. Which is brilliant, but seems more confined, like their world is just a smaller place, more intimate. But that’s just me. Not bad – just different hey??!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right about pratchett having more number of books over which he can explore his world but I think I feel that sense of vastness within each of the individual stories too.
And you’re right in that one is not bad, and the other is not good. They’re just different! And I think that’s a GOOD thing! It’s just interesting for me to note that I connect more with one over the other, I guess!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never read a Terry Pratchett, can you believe it? Where should I start as a newbie?
I too started only a short while ago, Laila! 😀 And now am filled with pleasure at the thought of ALL THE BOOKS! tbh, I’ve just read the Tiffany Aching series so far, so my recommendation would the first in that–The Wee Free Men. But take a look around! There are a number of sub-series within the discworld, and it’s possible something else might appeal to you more! I know readers love the Nightwatch series within discworld too–maybe take a look at that as well?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Juhi!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, I am not saying this just cause I’m defensive of Diana Wynne Jones, although she’s my favorite and I am, BUT: Diana Wynne Jones is better on a reread. I don’t know that I’ve ever connected to one of her books emotionally on the first try (well, maybe one or two of them), but on a reread I always end up loving them better. Some of the ones I found most opaque have become the ones that tear my heart up the most. Just for what that’s worth!
Oh, it’s a whole lot of worth, Jenny! ESPECIALLY since DWJ is a favorite of yours! To hear YOU say that you connected more to her books on an emotional level on a re-read makes me feel nicer about my own reaction, and also makes me want to continue reading her, with possible re-reads tucked in as well.